• Cover
  • What Have We Here
  • Identity
  • Web
  • Cause
  • Illustration
  • Word
  • Campaigns
  • About/Contact
  • Read Me
  • Featured
  • pH. An idea blog.
  • Privacy & Terms
  • Menu

processhouse, inc.

  • Cover
  • What Have We Here
  • Identity
  • Web
  • Cause
  • Illustration
  • Word
  • Campaigns
  • About/Contact
  • Read Me
  • Featured
  • pH. An idea blog.
  • Privacy & Terms

Visit us on Insta
and Twitter.

Migration.

December 19, 2022

pH. an idea blog is getting its own domain: ph-an-idea-blog.com

First launched amidst the final months of the 2020 election, it’s time for a relaunch and its own address.

pH. will cover politics, justice, eco, tech, and health, but increasingly environmental matters and Climate Change. It intends to share many ideas, but we also hope to hear your own.

Please subscribe, follow the blog, comment, and follow us on social media. Your participation, contributions, and insights are always welcome.

Together, we can tackle the seemingly insoluble problems that face us today, because collective intelligence, kindness, and foresight are everything we need. We can get where we are going one thoughtful step at a time. pH. hopes to start that process.

The pH. name derives from the initials of its parent, Processhouse, Inc., an atypical design company. It reminds us of the pH test in chemistry, “potential of hydrogen,” that indicates the acidity or basicity of an aqueous solution. Like the test, pH. is an indication on a spectrum and strives for balance.

We hope you will find it useful as you strive for balance in this infuriating, challenging, and perplexing world that surrounds us all today. The alternatives are resignation, despair, and cynicism—qualities this world has in far too great a supply.

We won’t have them here.

Come along with us as we explore the possibility of meaningful change.

After all, we’re only a single click away.

Red is for urgency, Green is for sanity, Blue is for a careful transformation.

Red is for urgency, Green is for sanity, Blue is for a careful transformation.

Three Tenets.

October 06, 2021

If we are going to create a sustainable economy, we must accept three tenets.

First, that we are doing nothing. Yes, of course, all of our progress stems from our continued efforts, but the scale and scope of our green plans are insufficient. Let’s not continue to argue particulars and simply accept that we have not adequately addressed the challenge of climate change.

This will save a great deal of time.

Second, all infrastructure must become green. There is no point to rebuilding infrastructure that perpetuates an emissions-based economy. Roads and bridges will be repaired, and that is important, but what part of our expenditure is going to create a sustainable way of living? What will we gain from our $3.5 trillion, and how many times can we afford to spend that sum?

Lastly, we must transform all of our jobs and materials into sustainable practices and beneficial components. Each job must help create balance and shepherd the environment, not simply the economy. The materials we use in our everyday lives must have a sustainable, productive endpoint. We can no longer create products whose lifespan is a mere six months, nor can we use fossil fuel-derived plastics to package every item, and wrap each portion of food.

All of this takes determination and will, so I will ask, “Are you willing to focus on these ideas?” Are you willing to accept that we are doing…“nothing?”

The current infrastructure package is certainly filled with green incentives, but how will we ensure their true implementation? Have many localized, fragmented systems worked smoothly in recent memory? How is vaccination going?

The country is significantly split on how to proceed with our democracy, and is still coping with an enormous amount of fear. It’s hard to care about macro-solutions for the environment, when a green agenda directly threatens your job security and perceived way of life.

Apart from sending Kamala Harris off for another round of speeches, I don’t see where this, or any administration, settles down and speaks to the average person about the benefits of a sustainable future. It’s not that the administration is talking down to anyone, but rather a direct result of our not learning how to speak to one another.

Educated Ivy-league types—such as those attracted to government—rarely speak the language of an Oklahoma oil rigger. Yet, that is where the discussion should begin.

We all have commonalities and we must begin to address them. The oil rigger and the Tesla-driving tech worker both need jobs: in this case, one already has one, while the other’s is precarious, but the common thread between them is employment.

Let’s start there.

Does anyone believe that the current economy was established to provide people employment? Employment is viewed as a necessary evil to achieve profits. Automation and robotics, developed with the prospect of enhancing efficiency and reducing burdens, is driven by the reduction of jobs and the resulting efficiencies are not shared in an “equitable” manner. Society may benefit from cheaper goods, but the earth suffers and our dependency on self-destructive practices continues to grow.

We must uncouple Capitalism from self-destruction—a terrible challenge. Perhaps this is where law and power come into play. Whomever has power, makes the laws, and though that table has always favored the corporate, the recognition of legal damages is growing.

Do entire industries have an inalienable right to destroy our future through their continued existence? At some point, “damages” say no. Where are the leverage points and in what way could the law lead to a cessation of harmful practice?

Can a conservative Supreme Court see the peril to our future and balance the man-made advantages of the corporation, relative to the needs of mankind?

Anything is possible.

Pressure our legislators and our government officials on all levels, to put self-interest aside and use sustainability as a yardstick. Become relentless, and switch up your targets.

One day, connect with your government, another, a corporation, on a third, your friends.

The antidote to doing ‘nothing’ is to start ‘something.’ No job will transform overnight into the engine of a green economy. You need to advocate that change. Gain allies. Speak with the departments of your local colleges and universities. Speak to your local and regional school boards. 

Talk to your police. Are your police department’s practices “sustainable?” Talk to your grocer. Is the packaging at your supermarket sustainable? 

I know. Yuck…

Nobody really wants to talk to anyone. We all just want to be left alone to do what we do…but…you can get over it, and then, we can do it together.

A million conversations, addressing a million jobs, will push the needle from unconscious destruction to beneficial commiseration. It will strengthen unexercised ties that are already there.

Put your oars in the water.

Then…we just have to pull.

all_green_jobs_meta.png

Every Job is Green.

April 01, 2021

We have this remarkable chance to reinvent our economy and pursue a green, sustainable path. The question is, will we take it? It’s unimaginable, and yet…easily imagined: every job must transform into a green job, solely for a green purpose.

The debate over economic theory can wait—let’s reimagine these jobs now.

Which institutions give us the best chance to practice environmentalism? What positions are already in place to foster change in the system we already have? What practical changes can we anticipate, and where do they fall short? If they do, can we skip the wringing of hands, and just reevaluate our efforts?

What will it take to develop and support lab and plant meat firms? What dynamics can shift this entire industry from “traditional” to “sustainable?” Is it a matter of knowledge, marketing, or investment? There are plenty of marketing geniuses in our society who can stimulate demand. Automobile companies are pledging to sell only environmental vehicles by a certain date. Can we set a date for phasing out cattle, as well?

Think of the jobs required for this new industry to grow. Consider the benefits of distributing emission-less meat labs throughout a local community, rather than relying on giant polluting meat-processing plants in disadvantaged areas. How much carbon would we save deconstructing the central distribution system of transporting meat throughout the country? Then, there is a further benefit—beyond the expansive issue of animal rights. We can reduce an army of low wage, exploited workers, as the slaughterhouse becomes an artifact of the past.

With solar, we need a massive technological review, shrewd forecasting, and a policy change. We must align investment with practice, balancing the speed of implementation against the risk of obsolescence. Where will solar work best, and can we understand, communicate, and accomplish a plan quickly enough, with the necessary scale? How do we create a flexible grid in a multitude of jurisdictions that is both resilient and coherent? The scope of policy and technical planning is stratospheric. Think of the jobs, from planner to developer, financier to engineer, installer to technician.

Consider the requirements for engineering. It’s one thing to create a class of engineers to maintain the structures of our past (or our Capitalistic future). It’s another to develop skilled leaders who will pioneer environmental change. Geothermal, wind, wave, solar, hydrogen, nuclear—on a global scale—could change the role of engineer from solely serving business, to becoming indispensable stewards of a sustainable world. Will engineers follow or lead, and if they lead, will they also be able to listen?

Consider organizing within the realm of politics. Which schools are best for shepherding political action? How can we shift from the self-serving universe of politics to a system that advocates true benefits for everyone? A series of self-serving interests is not the same as a common goal. As admirable as many of the efforts of these groups are, advocacy for a common goal is stronger than a set of narrowly-crafted concessions.

The technology involved in these efforts is inspiring: STEM on steroids, but where will the encouragement and focus come from to expand beyond “market-driven solutions?” What policy and funding will develop the solutions we need? Does our current system have the proper emphasis and focus, or is it designed simply to update the processes of our past? A shift is required, from “profit” to “sustainability.” Where will that shift begin?

Data Visualization and Social Media are the lubricants of our future. What do they “connect” and “visualize”—right now—and for what purpose? How do we propel our vast cycles of communication towards a green end? Currently, schools teach students and share knowledge primarily for commercial purposes. How can we change that emphasis?

Rather than argue about accuracy and distrust the statistics, we need to manage a blizzard of relentless data. We must strengthen our systems of measurement to foster understanding and relieve the sense of being overwhelmed.

So many jobs concern the physical world, beyond energy and education. Will plastics change through insect shells, plants, or algae? Can we plan a transformation on such a global scale? Will we emerge from the trance of fossil fuels, unable even to imagine the size of our efforts? The jobs are mind-boggling: cultivating materials, rethinking containers, growing plastics, developing supply chains, maintaining a closer relationship between needs and means. This is a reinvention as profound as food, interwoven in our lives as tightly as fossil fuel. You may drive an electric vehicle, powered by electricity from the sun, but what will you wrap your food in?

The plastics themselves are just a beginning. The world needs repackaging and our products themselves need re-envisioning. We can’t rely—as we have—on fossil fuel to package every item and snack, and our clothing and appliances need to last much longer than they do today—“forever” being a good measure. This is a seismic shift and it will take a generation of designers to make it happen.

Then, there are the very spaces in which we live and work. Where are the best green schools for architecture and construction? What will it take to support them? We must reinvent these industries down to their very last detail. It’s yet another industry with its imagination in transition. Once freed solely from the constructs of Capitalism, it can reshape its services to the dictates of the earth. I know this sounds naive and “earth-motherly,” but when one goal is “profit” and the other is “life,” there is a question as to whether either is sustainable. Driving off a cliff with record profits is still driving off a cliff. The effort extends far beyond the issues of green concrete and energy efficient buildings, to the very nature of how space affects our lives. 

What army of workers, engineers, and technicians are needed to sequester carbon? What systems of management, maintenance, and compliance will the world use? Will we all have competing systems—with conflicting differences intact—or symbiotic cooperation? How will Forestry and Oceanography become involved? The management of resources just became the management of impacts—something rarely seen in human history, except when defined in terms of risk and profit.

How many millions of workers will we need to reverse the current use of the rainforest? Clear-cutting must become conservation, through policy, education, economics, and protection. Interacting with the rainforest in a sustainable manner is the polar opposite of simply cutting down trees. This shift from consumption to conservation—up and down the supply chain—will require millions of new jobs. 

For a green world to prosper, we must address every form of imbalance. The cascading effects that lead to famine mean that green economies have not taken root at every level. Currently, people survive due to the top down attention of their governments (i.e. having functioning governments to protect their economies). What if we addressed famine as a wholistic concern, with a shared set of remedies practiced all over the world? Think of the jobs and infrastructure needed to propel this effort beyond the World Health Organization, the Foreign Service, ambassadors and NGOs.

War is built around resources. If resources are no longer for exploitation, but management, what becomes of war? Does it shift its purpose, or does it lose its reason for being? Is the state of our world’s governments the best we can do to manage human impulses and greed? If the world takes unlimited energy from the sun, what will become the new resources in short supply? How can we move from exploitation to cooperation, and what education, research, policy, and development becomes necessary to achieve this goal? Are our existing systems of education producing enlightened solutions, or simply colonial, nationalist, and capitalistic outputs? Will any of these lead to positive environmental change?

There are so many other sectors from which green jobs can evolve. How much law will be written? How far will educational practices extend and expand? What will it take to reframe finance—or must there always be a conflict between sustainability and profit?

Each area has the potential to create millions of jobs befitting this new direction.

Our practices and occupations will no longer strive to claim a piece of the pie, but instead, share the whole amongst ourselves—all of ourselves. This may seem a radical or simply naive notion, but the alternative is failure. Nature has determined that “our” game is “off,” and it moves to cancel us as we bicker amongst ourselves. We must move beyond taking from the other to providing betterment for all, or we can wear ourselves down to an environmental nub.

What will it take to choose one and not the other?

Jobs. Millions of green jobs. Right now, as quickly as we can. 

green_jobs_meta.png

Green Jobs.

February 04, 2021

Where are the green jobs we desperately need? Where will they come from?

As we relentlessly cleave to our old ways, how and where will these alternatives arise? Instead of blindly reverting to an “old economy,” can we seriously consider “real action?”

If recent history is any indication, inertia and greed will corrupt, weaken, or reverse any promises of incremental change. Do we really understand the extent to which recycling isn’t working, or whether composting efforts should scale? Does anyone besides an activist really care?

Our government has money. It’s their only way to fuel an engine of change.

What should they spend it on?

Traditional projects simply result in opportunities to pollute. These “non-solutions” lead to nothing but potholes and decrepitude. Certainly, we need to fix roads and bridges—for safety alone—but what sustainability benefits do roads currently offer?

When COVID is finally “vaccinated,” we’ll need to rescue our public transportation systems from the pit of bankruptcy, but will public transport continue to function in the same way as before?

Should commuting remain the focus of a transit model, or should we transform office towers into something more sustainable, like affordable housing?

Should you shop anymore or does delivery cause less of an impact? Should you consume so much? Have you any conception of the consequences of your consumption? As we grapple with an economic catastrophe and global pandemic, we are answering none of these questions.

We barely even care.

We simply want to get back to “normal” and continue to pour our money into economic stopgaps and cement sinkholes, when we should consider carefully transitioning our infrastructure funding to solar and “green” energy—while fixing the grids and supply chains that support us along the way.

We can keep channeling money traditionally, in the hopes that the economic engine reignites—but what if it doesn’t? Are we simply meant to do less, and then starve? Is that the extent of our planning?

And, what if we get the economy “roaring” again? Do we wait for the next pandemic, or do we wait for an environmental disaster that is simply too big to ignore?

The sad truth is we will continue to do whatever we can get away with.

If reentering the Paris Accord satisfies anyone, then—“Whew!...we’re off that hook”— back to talking about jobs, infrastructure, and the economy. We can return to managing an endless global competition for resources, resulting in war, famine, and environmental disaster: the story of the world.

Does anyone really think China—or anyone else for that matter, beyond possibly the Europeans—is going to endorse a position of global cooperation, if competition for resources becomes inflamed?

Won’t authoritarian opportunists maximize their leverage at every turn, taking advantage of each conflict to highlight only what is being lost?

The only way out of this dilemma is sustainability that buoys everyone: green jobs, with a green purpose.

Responsible demand. Meeting basic societal needs, through flexible industries, that are able to produce within reason. Less arguing and more listening. A cradle-to-grave system for materials. An investment in the possibilities of peace, instead of “peace” through domination.

Yes, it’s a tall order, but it starts here.

Our government has to start spending and very quickly. Tell them what they should spend it on. Tell them now and tell them often.

Tell them in a way they can clearly hear and don’t stop telling them until the job is done.

now_what_01.png

Now What.

November 25, 2020

Joe Biden has decisively won election as the 46th President of the United States. Donald Trump still refuses to accept the outcome, even though he begrudgingly authorized the GSA to release the transition funds. Various Republicans pressured him to face up to the reality of Biden’s win, but I’m not giving anyone credit.

The GOP, for all intents and purposes, backed Donald Trump and pretended that the election was still in doubt. Everyone—except the Republicans—agreed that there was an absence of credible evidence supporting voter fraud. It is a non-issue, stirred up by Trump himself to provide cover for his definitive loss.

The facts are clear. What part of 306 electoral votes and over 6 million more popular votes do the Republicans and Trump supporters not understand?

The progressive consensus is that Trump is laying the groundwork for a coup or simply perpetrating one more self-aggrandizing scam: continuing to solicit unrestricted funds from Trump supporters to “fight the election fraud” and create a super PAC.

His lawsuits are going nowhere and—apparently—he can redirect this money to himself and his interests, even to finance his lifestyle, if he so desires. Both issues are lost on Trump supporters. It seems they just want to give the guy money, regardless of its relationship to reality.

So what is happening?

Are we waiting for the man’s other shoe to drop, or are we waiting for him to commit some intolerable outrage as he walks out the door, burning the place down with a mic drop? He certainly tried, when he asked the Pentagon for options to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities. Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed and his irrational request was rebuffed.

Just how dangerous can this wounded President be? (I know. The answer is, “What time is it?”, and, “Is someone  checking?”)

One thing is certain: we are all being held hostage to his drama. By now, we know the price of wrestling with a raging egomaniac. It’s unwholesome, traumatic, and the endgame is—sadly—never pretty. 

In the meantime, we are a big country and there are things we need to do.

Of utmost importance is winning the two Georgia Senate runoffs to gain a potential majority in the Senate (taking into consideration Kamala Harris’ tie-breaking vote as Vice President.) The runoff election hasn’t even occurred, and people are talking about West Virginia’s nominal Democrat, Joe Manchin, breaking ranks and voting with the Republicans to block progressive issues—defeating the whole purpose of gaining the two seats in the first place. Let the machinations and intrigue begin.

There is also infighting between the progressive wing of the Democratic Party and the “moderates” or “Centrists.”

John Kasich, complaining about the Ohio loss, is lining up to bash Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for progressive messaging that he says cost the Democrats House seats.

AOC rightly—and more calmly than is warranted—points out that no representative running on The Green New Deal or Medicare For All lost their race.

Others have also pointed out that “Defund the Police” was not a Democratic Party slogan, but arose from the streets, for—obviously—legitimate reasons. This distinction hasn’t stopped anyone from blaming Black Lives Matter for basically existing, as if it were some sort of embarrassing inconvenience. It’s wrong to treat BLM as a crazy uncle to put back in the attic—rather than a galvanizing social movement.

Blaming anyone for unhelpful messaging misses the point. The focus should be on the useful message that was never delivered, not merely the failed one that was firmly rejected.

There is a tremendous mismatch between the varied needs of the American people and a binary choice between Trump and Biden. It’s chastening to learn that people’s true interests are based in conflict. A clear choice to one is the opposite for another, and a mixed decision for a third, especially when economic self-interest is the primary concern. Very few people vote against an economy that is serving them, let alone for someone who will take those resources away. This is what pollsters believe happened with Latinos voting for Trump on the oil-dependent Texas border. They “should” have rejected a President who disrespected them, but instead voted to preserve their jobs, concerned about the prospect of a Biden reduction in fossil fuel.

AOC is calling for more robust digital campaigns throughout the party. She has been slammed for doing so, as if she were advocating for even more uncomfortable progressive messaging, rather than simply calling for a more relevant system of message delivery. She suggests spending at least $200,000 on Facebook in the last week of an election: Many failing campaigns spent numbers closer to $2,000. Boomers and Millennials would like to pretend that Gen Z doesn’t exist, instead of seeing them charging up behind them in the rearview mirror.

Moderates versus Progressives, Establishment versus Black Lives Matter, Old versus New: How are these conflicts helping anyone, especially with a madman (with 70 million supporters) still in the White House?

For example, we need to address coronavirus, which, frankly, no one is doing. 

Too many people are not cooperating and, after eight months, we can’t even get this aspect of the pandemic under control. Much of the populace still refuses to comply with the most basic preventive measure—wearing a mask. Apparently, America is the Land of the Free, as long as freedom is defined as making reckless choices and avoiding all responsibility.

The Biden team has a clear plan to address COVID-19 and will hit the ground running. However, individual and collective behavior is still the key to gaining control. An effective vaccine is certainly a reason for encouragement, but we need to slow the spread until it becomes widely available. 

If we can’t manage a pandemic and restart an economy, how are we going to accomplish something exponentially more significant, such as advancing efforts to mitigate climate change?

Do we have any plans for addressing the issue beyond rejoining the Paris Accord, believing that something will happen in 2035 or 2050? The Georgia Senate runoffs will directly influence Joe Biden’s ability to reverse the damaging environmental policies enacted by the Trump Administration. Only so much can be achieved through Executive Order.

Foremost, we must address climate change with an eye to the economy, caring about the effects on both the winners and losers. We must invest in guidance necessary for the innumerable transitions that will occur along the way. This is not a laissez-faire activity. 

Except for COVID. 

COVID inadvertently showed us what a reduction in our economy could do for the planet, simply by stopping us in our tracks. How do we learn from this experience, honoring the sacrifices of all we have lost, in order to achieve similar ends—but this time not triggering the accompanying economic shock?

Hyper-efficient automation and globalization have decimated jobs across America and are the true culprits of our chronic conditions. Life is becoming increasingly difficult, and the downward spiral is only quickening.

Is anyone actually addressing these issues?

We can no longer afford missteps or offsets. A new infrastructure can’t offer promise, but results solely in producing more emissions and pollution. Instead, we need a Green plan that anticipates consequences.

Through investment and the concept of economic sustainability, the market will essentially facilitate a Green transformation—but the market itself won’t resolve our environmental concerns—at least, never in a positive way. It simply has no incentive to do so. Its imperative is to squeeze the last ounce of profit from any resource in its grasp. Simple human effort can not match its scope. I can’t personally recycle my way out of anything, without a reinvention of consumption and an ‘alpha-to-omega’ cycle of accounting for materials: there simply is too much product in production.

Human action alone can not offset these engines, but we can change their very conception and direction. That’s how we got here—through thought and imagination—and that’s how we’ll get from here to somewhere else.

It requires immense patience in resolving the seemingly insoluble and finding courage in the face of immediate need. It’s hard to care about the environment, when you have trouble finding a job, and feeding your family. It’s hard to vote against a tyrant when that tyrant is the best chance for keeping your job.

A focus on employment, education, and environmentally-beneficial productivity will lead us to a sustainable economy. The abstraction of “profit”—with its false sense of value and its illusion of control—withers in the face of an increasingly unsustainable planet. 

It’s time to shake your head awake and stop watching the train wreck. A door is opening. Drop the infighting and run through it.

All of our dreams are possible once we reach the other side.

random_01.png

Random.

October 13, 2020

I’ve noticed something interesting about the reports of various individuals who are contracting COVID. They appear to be of varying ages and not limited to blocks of infection in nursing homes, or choir practice, or communal gatherings.

Anecdotally, people are becoming infected from a random friend or relative with whom they’ve shared an hours’ worth of conversation.

A brother comes to visit. You talk outside for a few hours, in this case wearing gaiters (the sport nylon neck warmers—which, not coincidently, have been shown to increase aerosol risk—for both you and others—rather than decrease it!)

Unbeknownst to you, your brother had COVID, and now you have it.

A friend comes to share a treat with you and you share a beer together, of course, unmasked. Your friend had COVID, and didn’t know, and now you have COVID.

All this hand washing, mask wearing, social distancing, temperature taking, and hand-wringing may be for naught, because it all comes down to a random social encounter. One person is unaware of having the virus and the other is unprotected in some way.

It leads to a tragic question: why, so many months into this crisis, do we not have relevant protection in the face of simple human need?

Are we to forgo our socializing or togetherness—a need that humans require and thrive upon—for the duration? Will the fundamental connections in our society change forever?

Sure, yes, vaccines and everything, but it will take many iterations before they 1) exist, and 2) are distributed and have the chance to have an impact on the whole.

With all this diligence, how many random encounters will continue to result in infection, before this happens?

What if we had devices that “dropped” the air during conversation?

What if everyone had proper masks and really knew how to wear them?

What if everyone cooperated?

Asking people to do without meaningful social contact—those “real things”—stolen moments with friends, as opposed to Zoom calls—is painfully inhuman.

A little real contact goes a tremendously long way.

But with the mystery and ignorance surrounding this virus, that contact could be also fateful.

Without relevant protection, our number comes up.

It is difficult not to drink the water in an oasis in the middle of a desert. All the virtual contact in the world, or time with family, does not prepare us to avoid the real thing.

Be extra careful with those random contacts. The wind between you is full of aerosols.

Do not throw caution to the wind.

toc_tpu_02_meta.png

pH. Tuesday Pop-Up no. 2 →

October 13, 2020
missle_01.png

That bad.

October 11, 2020

Let’s review, shall we?

What is a rocket without its guidance system?

40% of this country apparently wants an authoritarian, seemingly racist, anti-science, anti-environmental lobby.

Currently, 60% don’t.*

Will this balance hold until November, or will Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida once again send our lives careening in another direction—a second suicide by Electoral College?

On the subject of guidance, where has Mr. Trump taken us these last three and one-half years?

Jamal Khashoggi

The Washington Post columnist and Saudi dissident went to the Saudi embassy in Turkey for marriage documents and ended up dismembered. President Trump walked softly and endorsed the prime suspect’s point of view. The result—a complete loss of what remains of America’s moral authority and an abject collaboration with iniquity.

COVID

The response is in shambles. Where would we be if the president had taken this crisis seriously from an informed scientific point-of-view, rather than a self-interested economic one?

Climate

Another absolute disaster. We‘ve seen industry executives and lobbyists appointed to sensitive government positions, and witnessed more environmental rollbacks than a 90’s Walmart sale. They’re burning the midnight oil – along with all the other oil – to undo whatever years of rational behavior have accomplished. Furthermore, they’re just starting their engines.

Immigration

This issue is a public stain on our humanity. Liberty weeps and tears her garments at this signature issue. From “rapists” and “bad hombres” to private detention centers – and no one at ICE capable of using a spreadsheet to keep track of all the immigrant children they tear from their parents. Apparently, it’s not ICE’s problem once they finish the tearing apart.

Refugees

Syria is still minting refugees, as quickly as it is able. The issue of accepting these unfortunate souls spurred nationalism throughout Europe and played a large role in precipitating Brexit. Where are they now? Where have they gone? You can bet that these refugees are still suffering. Yet, to rid ourselves of any pretense of caring, we’ve abandoned our former allies, the Kurds, backed Turkish repression, and let Russia orchestrate unbridled military action in Syria. Perhaps this advances the interests of some Americans, but I don’t wish to see myself in their reflection.

Russia

Arguably – from any vantage point  – Vladimir Putin couldn’t ask for a better relationship with the United States: As opposed to checks and balances, or having to hear whining about Crimea and human rights, he gets to do whatever he wants. One striking example, is throwing doctors out of hospital windows. They had refused to work without protective gear. Perhaps Trump would like to employ the same practice here?

Race

Where to start? Probably with the accursed wall and the statement “there are good people on both sides,” about Charlottesville – and ending up with the campaign rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, site of an infamous black massacre in 1921, where hundreds died and “Black Wall Street” was bombed into oblivion from the air (yes, the air). To add further insult, the rally was scheduled for June 19 – “Juneteenth” – the day that marked the end of slavery. Full marks, as usual, for racial sensitivity. Adding to this sorry record is his response to peaceful protest. At every opportunity, he inflames and escalates violence. Rather than meet with the protesters gathered outside the White House, he chose to gas and club them, in order to walk across the street for a photo op, lifting a bible in front of a church.

Racist Symbols

With the world crying out for sensitivity and redress, this man signs an executive order protecting statues that commemorate the good works of Confederate racists. He calls for increased federal prosecution for acts of desecration, while not commenting on the damage these monuments represent.

The Constitution

—In tatters. At every turn, this bully tries to weaponize the Executive Branch. It’s not “uphold”: It’s more like “skirt” and “ignore.”

Congress
Instead of a deliberative body, we have an obstructive one. Progress is blocked, pockets are lined, and critical needs go unmet. Meanwhile, the president dismantles hard-won policy and regulations, while freely dissembling at will.

An unparalleled track record: huge, absolutely huge...the biggest.

Can we really survive these actions for four more years...and would we recognize ourselves afterwards?

It‘s one thing for a President to be aggressive. It’s another when he is antagonistic, destructive, and rudderless, except in cases of personal self-interest.

We have been leaderless for far too long, subject to a moral compass that is completely out of whack.

It’s time to get our bearings, and replace what we’ve lost.

*“Presidential Approval Ratings -- Donald Trump,” Gallup,
https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

toc_ssp_02_meta.png

pH. Sunday Special no. 2 →

October 11, 2020
power_meta.png

Power, Off.

October 11, 2020

Residential up. Business down. What gives?

But does air conditioning and fan use during a heatwave cause an unsustainable spike, with so many people at home?

And how do outages work with reliance on electricity for the virtual office? We’re certainly looking like a third world country, but only with bigger TVs.

Social unrest, police oppression, uncertain elections, and now power outages.

What does it take to motivate the institutional systems that sustain us to function properly together?

They are like Russian nesting dolls of complex dependencies, not a single one coordinating with another.

Is it too much to ask that virtual offices have dependable power or that a summer’s worth of electricity doesn’t burn us to the ground?

Apparently.

Like citizens in a third world nation, our role is to sit here and suck it up, unless we find our way to advocacy.

Advocacy is looking like a pretty good option, these days.

Beats sitting in the dark with a computer as a paperweight, hoping the hills don’t catch fire…waiting for a mail-in ballot.

“See how covid-19 is reshaping the electric rhythms of New York City,” The Washington Post,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/04/19/electricity-new-york/

“Covid-19 impact on electricity,” IEA,
https://www.iea.org/reports/covid-19-impact-on-electricity

“These 3 charts show what COVID-19 has done to global energy demand,”
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/covid19-change-energy-electricity-use-lockdowns-falling-demand/

“Sense Data Shows That Home Energy Demand Increased 22% Since Covid-19, Driving up Utility Bills, and Most People Decided to Stay Home Before Government Mandates,” CISION, PR Newswire,
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sense-data-shows-that-home-energy-demand-increased-22-since-covid-19-driving-up-utility-bills-and-most-people-decided-to-stay-home-before-government-mandates-301062944.html

lipstick_meta.png

Lipstick.

October 11, 2020

There’s a thing called the “Lipstick Index”, coined during the 2008 recession by Leonard Lauder, who runs the Estée Lauder Companies.

The idea is that no matter how bad it gets, women will treat themselves to a little lipstick.

That fell off a cliff with COVID. Lipstick sales plunged. The industry now hopes women will shift to something called the “Longwear Foundation (or Mascara) Effect”, or whatever the heck that is, which sounds like it’s grasping at straws.

It goes like this: People are in shutdown. Stores are closed. People don’t buy makeup.

Shutdown ends. We wear masks. People don’t wear lipstick.

Consultants are paid millions to notice these things and the hope is if women will not treat themselves to (less necessary) lipstick during COVID, then they will turn to something else.

The hope, also, is that everything will go right back to how it was whenever COVID is over.

Doesn’t this trivialize what is happening, trying to find relevance in old ways while COVID is upending things?

What is the environmental impact of the beauty industry?

Can it do more with less?

Can we do more with less?

Nothing wastes a new opportunity faster than an old paradigm.

Let’s get beyond lipstick and eyeliner and breathe life into something that matters.

“How COVID-19 is changing the world of beauty,” McKinsey & Company,
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/how-covid-19-is-changing-the-world-of-beauty#

“GOODBYE LIPSTICK EFFECT, HELLO MASCARA INDEX – HOW COVID-19 MAY HAVE CHANGED THE BEAUTY LANDSCAPE FOR GOOD,” Global Cosmetics News,
https://www.globalcosmeticsnews.com/goodbye-lipstick-effect-hello-mascara-index-how-covid-19-may-have-changed-the-beauty-landscape-for-good/

“Face masks may have killed off the ‘lipstick index.’ What’s the lipstick index?,” Fortune,
https://fortune.com/2020/07/07/lipstick-index-face-masks-coronavirus-nail-polish/amp/

“Kylie Jenner Has Something Else to Pout About,” Bloomberg,
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-06-02/kylie-jenner-coty-can-pout-over-covid-lipstick-sales-slump

“How to Tell Longwear Makeup Products From Those That’ll Peace Out in 2 Seconds,” Well + Good,
https://www.wellandgood.com/what-is-longwear-makeup/

grasping_meta.png

Grasping.

October 11, 2020

There is something political scientists and the Democrats haven’t grasped.

What happened in 2016?

Yes, people hate Hillary. Yes, the right wing is better organized and motivated at generating propaganda than moderates, progressives, or the Left. Yes, Comey screwed her over with his late announcement of the reopened email investigation.

Yes, yes, yes.

But what happened?

If the Russians are trolling, why does it work?

The reasons are right in front of us, yet we still don’t grasp them, let alone connect with the people who hold these contrary beliefs.

The forgotten Americans, who have been living eroded lives as their jobs were eliminated, have been truly forgotten.

Our country‘s elite considered them non-existent and—for all intents and purposes—they didn’t exist until the internet united them.

The arrogance of power meant that we never realized the affinities people held within their grievances. Thus, goes any revolution.

Progressives were righteous in their progress, but forgot to include the fearful, and were only interested in punishing them for their presumed or historical bigotry.

“Serves them right,” they said.

Well, “Serves them right”, the bigots replied in return—with their votes in 2016.

I may find your political and social views repugnant, but that’s only a judgment, and judgments are relative and debatable.

I can hate your point of view as much as I want, but we need the same air, same water, and need to exist on the same planet.

We have greater commonalities than differences.

What are we arguing about, anyway?

Do you really want to torment immigrants? Can’t we achieve your ends without being cruel?

And if your ends are unjust, won’t you listen to reason, if I, in turn, am willing to respectfully listen to you?

I‘m sure we can actually ‘hear’ and understand each other, if we try.

We share a common fear. We‘re just not addressing it, because we are agitated and too busy pointing fingers at each other. Panicking only serves to polarize our respective interests.

Political division is accomplished through the old standby, ‘divide and conquer.’

If anyone with an agenda keeps us at each other’s throats—if they fan the flames of chaos—then we’ll never find the time or the clarity needed to defend ourselves and neutralize their aggression.

I believe the disregarded people of this country need understanding. They certainly made their voices heard in the last election.

Without understanding, history will continue to repeat itself.

Because everybody counts.

Even if I disagree with everything you say.

That’s a ‘Nilla wafer.

That’s a ‘Nilla wafer.

Joe.

October 11, 2020

You may have noticed that President Trump and the Republican Party are trying to demonize Joe Biden.

This is akin to demonizing a cream puff.

It’s taken from the playbook of “smearing your opponent by re-characterizing his greatest strength.”

Joe Biden is an unquestionably “safe” person, with abundant integrity. This means you attack him as dangerous and present him as untrustworthy.

Clearly Joe Biden is an imminent danger.

Clearly Joe Biden is an imminent danger.

But worse than the attacks are the attackers, themselves.

Does anyone agree that this kind of sportsmanship—even in a blood sport like politics—is good for the American people: the preying on people’s basest fears?

In modern times, it’s a horrible trend, ever since Lee Atwater—George H. Bush’s Dark Knight—conceived the notorious Willie Horton ad to devastate Michael Dukakis. The Democratic Presidential candidate and liberal Governor of Massachusetts was annihilated during the 1988 Presidential Campaign.

It also worked very well in the 1930’s for Adolph Hitler.

As surreal as their thinking, but still not a threat.

As surreal as their thinking, but still not a threat.

It is a waste of time to fear a known-quantity, with a 44-year public record, who is running in the open against our current repressive political regime.

Better to question the integrity of the people launching these attacks, then draw your own logical conclusions.

On one side, there is a rabid hatred. On the other, a decent man trying to improve everyone’s lives.

Where is the danger?

It comes from the source, and not the target.

Certainly, you can see that from here.

postbox_meta.png

Going Postal.

October 11, 2020

By now, you know that President Trump is trying to interfere with the Post Office prior to the election. This is due to plans for the unprecedented mail-in ballot effort caused by COVID 19.

In some cases, this has meant that post boxes disappeared from neighborhoods as part of a suspiciously timed “downsizing” effort, as the Post Office is repurposed as a “business” and not a “service.”

It’s a service…and it’s our service.

It delivers the mail and during an election in a pandemic, it delivers mail-in ballots.

Who hides mailboxes in the middle of an election?

Any other president would do everything to ensure the system was ready for such a important task.

Not this president.

He is doing everything in his power to denigrate its integrity and hinder its operations.

What can you do?

You can carefully fill out your ballot and vote early

You can pay to send your ballot by trackable Priority Mail

You can drop it off on Election Day at an actual polling place. One hopes that standing in line is not involved for simply dropping off a ballot…one can always hope…

But, if you vote early, you still don’t know if your ballot will arrive—or if it will be handled properly once it gets there.

If you send it with tracking, you may know that it arrived, but you won’t know how it will be treated.

And if you drop it off on Election Day, you contribute to the last minute deluge of ballots, but at least you’ll know that the ballot made it to the polling place.

There is no good solution when the Federal government won‘t assist with the challenge and may actively work to hinder it.

So...back to what to do:

—If it’s close, don’t accept the election

—Don’t accept Supreme Court interference or any effort to cut off the careful counting of votes

—Demand that the election validate disputed ballots, due to signature differences, and the like

—No winners until all the votes are counted

Make every vote count. It is, above all, your civic duty.

If the worst happens, we’ll deal with it, but the election must be fair.

Support coverage of Election Day suppression, such as multi-hour wait times and changed polling places. Use social media to tell your elected representatives and officials that you will not stand for it.

Rise up.

Tell them the world is watching and support those who bear witness.

We have the means to monitor a fair election, through our collective vigilance.

Confirm your polling place then confirm it again. Take peoples’ names. Record video of people who try to turn you away—capture their excuses.

Ask them to repeat themselves, so there is no confusion.

If they move your postbox—move your ballot—to a place that counts.

Do not succumb to anger, but persist and keep the pressure on.

With different procedures and customs throughout every corner of the land, every vote must count.

You are making history, and the forces against you are desperate and unstable. They wouldn’t take these actions, if they weren’t.

Hold them accountable. History and the world will thank you.

Let nothing stand in your way.

toc_pH_02_meta.png

pH. no. 2 →

October 11, 2020
detachment_meta.png

Detachment.

October 06, 2020

With all the dire need, you may wonder why there isn’t a new COVID relief package.

That’s because all the entities that needed to have their losses abated have already gotten their piece of the pie.

As long as mega-corporations and political donors’ businesses were at risk, the Republicans were comfortable with a trillion-dollar blank check, but now, when it comes to individuals, look at all the hesitation.

Why?

Is the situation any less dire? Is there any evidence of a reduction in need?

No, of course, not.

If anything, we are hanging on to a precipice, and the Republicans are dithering, just like their ignorant Ditherer in Chief.

Give me one reason not to continue the economic bailout?

Too much?...really? “Undeserving”, “counter-productive,” “poor people won‘t want to work”: give me a break.

Why is this the case, other than that the people who matter most to the Republicans have already been taken care of—and as usual, from a Republican point of view, the people—the little people—the rank and file—the peons, the minions, the peasants—can take care of themselves...whatever the situation, whatever the odds. They are, after all, chaff.

Are we really going to drive a rent and eviction crisis off a cliff?

Are we really going to pretend that people can eat, when their only measure of sustainability is taken away?

What do the Republicans expect?

“Oh, you’ll make do. You’ll find a way. Just no longer on our tab, you...’undeserving.’”

Well...no one deserves this.

Trickle-down economics is only as good as the size of the trickle, and if you happen to be standing right under it.

Nothing about this economic behavior addresses a tsunami of debt, eviction, or despair.

Nothing about this attitude answers ‘what to do,’ when the price tag for inaction climbs, and the situation worsens.

Republican supporters are happy to say, “we got ours.”

On November 3, ask the people who hold these views to leave both the Congress and the White House.

Replace them with people who actually care—and who believe we are all in this together.

toc_tpu_01_meta.png

pH. Tuesday Pop-Up no. 1 →

October 06, 2020
Yabba-dabba Do!

Yabba-dabba Do!

The Joker in Chief.

October 04, 2020

It’s been a long three and three-quarters years, with just under three weeks left before the November election.

We owe it to future generations to review what this time has meant for so many Americans. There are 52 cards and 8.06e+67—8.06 times 10 to the 67th power—possible combinations in each deck:

It’s a 68 digit number: so many possibilities.

It’s a 68 digit number: so many possibilities.

Let’s see what President Trump has done with his hand.

Let’s count the number of immigrants affected in this country, illegal or otherwise. How many children have been separated from their families, and subsequently “misplaced,” or—better put—“never tracked?”

How many essential low-paying support jobs, done primarily by immigrants, has he thrown into chaos? No American wants to wash dishes, pick crops, or slice pork bellies, and yet the President has classified these hard-working people as ICE‘s top priority. Just imagine the ever-present fear in the immigrant community under his reign.

How many victims suffer from pollution in the United States? What has he done for them, other than aggravate their conditions?

What has he done for the uninsured, other than plan to add more to their ranks by removing the protections of the Affordable Care Act, Obamacare?

How has he addressed pharmaceutical profits, which are rising astronomically? How many people are affected by their price-gouging and category restrictions?

What has he done for our soldiers in the Middle East—if not around the world—other than threaten their safety and security? Does retreating from commitments and betraying allies create a safer environment?

How many ICE agents has Donald Trump radicalized with his relentless war on immigration? How did they behave before Donald Trump? How much cruelty has occurred on his watch and how many abnormal operations are now considered as the norm? Do they realize how much suffering their actions have caused as they carry out their “duty?”

How many millions of people across the United States are negatively affected by the President’s actions? Does anyone truly breathe easier? Are they healthier? Are they less fearful? Is their job any more stable?

How is he contributing to future cancer rates? How many people will become a statistic because of the environmental rollbacks he is seeking?

There are 35 Senate seats up for reelection this November and Donald Trump has made turning those seats more important than ever.

There are 13 battleground states—he‘s made them equally significant.

So, let‘s review the accomplishments.

Not a single effort benefits a real public issue; Instead, they feed a dark manipulated perception: bad immigrants. bad poor people, bad radicals. In doing so, the administration follows an essential policy of divisive madness.

And through it all, our Joker plays the Wild Card, since everything depends on how much disruption and chaos he creates. These distractions further an agenda of de-evolution, destroying the very systems that others have worked so hard to achieve: the unravelling of government, dissolution of healthcare, the subversion of women‘s and voter‘s rights, sowing social and racial division, all the while promoting virulent Capitalism for all.

With so little empathy and rationale, it’s as if he lacks the fundamental tools to act with decency and foresight.

And through it all, the Senate enables him.

It‘s time we played with a full deck, and a different set of cards.

I’ve had enough. Have you?


Selected Reading

As Priyansh Rastogi tells us in his informative blog post, “Every time you shuffle a deck of cards, chances are that you have put them in an order that has never been seen in the history of the universe.”
https://blog.priyanshrastogi.com/crazy-math-every-time-you-shuffle-a-deck-of-cards-chances-are-that-you-make-history-7afe34c8dcb3

“Key findings about U.S. immigrants,” Pew Research Center,
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/20/key-findings-about-u-s-immigrants/

“Family Separation by the Numbers What Are the Jobs That Immigrants Do?” Scientific American Blog Network, https://www.newamericaneconomy.org/sites/all/themes/pnae/img/Immigrant_Workers_Brookings.pdf

”Asthma Facts,“ AAFA.org,
https://www.aafa.org/asthma-facts/

“How Many Americans Are Uninsured? — 2020, Policy Advice,
https://policyadvice.net/health-insurance/insights/how-many-americans-are-uninsured/

“Top health insurers' revenues soared to almost $1 trillion in 2019,” BenefitsPRO,
https://www.benefitspro.com/2020/02/24/top-health-insurers-revenues-soared-to-almost-1-trillion-in-2019/

“Top 20 Pharma Companies by Market Cap in Q1 2019,” BioSpace,
https://www.biospace.com/article/top-20-pharma-companies-by-market-cap-in-q1-2019/

“Health insurance coverage in the United States,” Wikipedia,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_insurance_coverage_in_the_United_States

“After Recent Deployments, How Many U.S. Troops Are in the Middle East?,” US News,
https://www.usnews.com/news/elections/articles/2020-01-09/after-recent-deployments-how-many-us-troops-are-in-the-middle-east

“Most Americans Dislike the Way Donald Trump Conducts Himself, Survey Finds,” US News,
https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2020-03-05/most-americans-dislike-the-way-donald-trump-conducts-himself-survey-finds

“U.S. and World Population Clock,” United States Census Bureau,
https://www.census.gov/popclock/

“Figure 1: Trends in Age-adjusted Cancer Death Rates* by Site, Males, US, 1930-2017,” Cancer.org,
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2020/trends-in-age-adjusted-cancer-death-rates-by-site-males-1930-2017.pdf

”Figure 2: Trends in Age-adjusted Cancer Death Rates* by Site, Females, US, 1930-2017,” Cancer.org,
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2020/trends-in-age-adjusted-cancer-death-rates-by-site-females-1930-2017.pdf

“United States Cancer Statistics: Data Visualizations,” CDC,
https://gis.cdc.gov/Cancer/USCS/DataViz.html

2020 Senate Election Interactive Map
https://www.270towin.com/2020-senate-election/

“2020 election: The most competitive Senate races,” Axios,
https://www.axios.com/senate-seats-election-2020-54bee405-7f43-456c-936f-5bc75758bc59.html

“United States Senate elections, 2020,” Ballotpedia,
https://www.axios.com/senate-seats-election-2020-54bee405-7f43-456c-936f-5bc75758bc59.html

“Wild Explanation Of How Many 52-Card Deck Combinations There Are Just Crushed My Brain,” BroBible,
https://brobible.com/life/article/deck-cards-total-number-order-cominations/

“The Cost of Immigration Enforcement and Border Security,“ American Immigration Council,
https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/the-cost-of-immigration-enforcement-and-border-security


toc_ssp_01_meta.png

pH. Sunday Special no. 1 →

October 04, 2020
whorl_01.png

Whorl.

October 01, 2020

This election is making it hard to concentrate.

There is so much important work to be done, and this administration stands in the way of all of it.

Our forefathers have given us the remarkable opportunity to change the country’s political administration every four years, if not every two.

This is a gift of boundless value and yet so many squander it.

One benefit of a free society is that you can think what you please—however, some people think voting is not worth their time or effort.

This works well for some, and so they don’t address this lack of participation. After all, if you don’t care, you get what you deserve: a government for the people who did care to participate.

But this leaves out the issue of systematic suppression.

I have never had to wait hours to cast my vote.

I have never been subjected to tests or humiliations.

If someone tries to take me off the voter rolls, I have recourse to address the situation.

I have never had my polling place hidden or arbitrarily changed at the last moment.

In short, I live in a state and have the education that protects me from disenfranchisement. Others are not so lucky.

And who is preying on them?

We all know about the contortions of redistricting, the attempt to curtail the census, and the aggressive use of voter IDs. Add to this, the purging of election rolls—but who is really doing this?

One party is doing this…and why? Because they’re afraid of losing power, of losing their jobs, of losing ground to the “other”—all valid fears, but not honorable reasons to cheat.

You never know what you have until it is gone.

Steadily, this administration is eroding our peace of mind and our well-being.

What will we do with an unthinkable “four-more-years”?

It’s a disaster in the making, but one we can avert, with our care, consideration, and belief in what is just.

Lives always depend on every American election. This one, however, is different.

Change history and lead us away from all the darkness.

Vote like life depends on it, because, in this case, it really does.

Prev / Next

pH.

An idea blog. A spectrum.

The power of realization /
the potential of care.

From Processhouse, Inc.


Featured:

Featured
Dec 19, 2022
Migration.
Dec 19, 2022
Dec 19, 2022
Oct 6, 2021
Three Tenets.
Oct 6, 2021
Oct 6, 2021
Apr 1, 2021
Every Job is Green.
Apr 1, 2021
Apr 1, 2021
Feb 4, 2021
Green Jobs.
Feb 4, 2021
Feb 4, 2021
Nov 25, 2020
Now What.
Nov 25, 2020
Nov 25, 2020
Oct 13, 2020
Random.
Oct 13, 2020
Oct 13, 2020
Oct 13, 2020
pH. Tuesday Pop-Up no. 2
Oct 13, 2020
Oct 13, 2020
Oct 11, 2020
That bad.
Oct 11, 2020
Oct 11, 2020
Oct 11, 2020
pH. Sunday Special no. 2
Oct 11, 2020
Oct 11, 2020
Oct 11, 2020
Power, Off.
Oct 11, 2020
Oct 11, 2020